The association between fear of childbirth and social support through the Internet and Social Networking Services in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study.

Social support is an important factor in reducing fear of childbirth (FOC). Recently, the Internet and Social Networking Services (SNS) have become new forms of social support. However, it is unclear whether such support can reduce pregnant women's fear. This study aimed to investigate the association between FOC and social support through the Internet and SNS in pregnant women. A cross-sectional study using a web-based questionnaire including questions about FOC, social support, the Internet and SNS usage, psychological variables, and sociodemographic variables was conducted. Data from 111 participants were analyzed. A greater number of social support from people who are often seen during pregnancy, and becoming relieved by interaction with others through the Internet and SNS were negatively associated with FOC. This study showed that face-to-face social support was associated with lower FOC, while social support through the Internet and SNS was not. Further research is needed on how to use Internet and SNS to reduce FOC in pregnant women.

A global survey on national standard care for newborn bathing.

AIM: To describe national standard care for newborn bathing and its influential factors. METHODS: A global survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire. The targeted countries were 166 member countries of either the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) or the International Council of Nurses (ICN). An eligible person included someone well informed of midwifery education/training or neonatal care, including newborn bathing, in their country. To examine the factors associated with the standard care for newborn bathing, information on mean annual temperature, precipitation, gross domestic product per capita, and basic water coverage was collected as external factors. Student's t tests and Chi-square tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Care standards were identified in 46 countries: seven from Africa, eight from the Americas, 15 from Asia, 14 from Europe, and two from Oceania. In most countries, newborns were bathed with warm water in a tub within 10 min. Bathing frequency, moisturization, and use of soap or cleanser varied by country. There were significant associations between bathing frequency and temperature and between moisturization and precipitation. CONCLUSION: The national standard care for newborn bathing in each country was unique. Standard bathing care was associated with the climate. More consideration should be given to the differences in standard care for newborn bathing between countries when interpreting existing studies and conducting future studies on neonatal skin care.

Lessons from the "Humanization of Childbirth" Projects: Qualitative analysis of seven projects funded by the Japan International Cooperation Agency.

The "Humanization of Childbirth" Project is one of the various maternity care models that respect women and their newborn children. For more than a quarter of a century, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) has been implementing technical cooperation projects worldwide that place the humanization of childbirth at the center of the concept. By reviewing the project reports, the following 11 key processes were found for the formulation and implementation of future projects for the humanized maternity care: i) project-finding/exploration of unmet needs, ii) identification of local key persons, iii) organization of a project team and a back-up committee, iv) development of an action plan, v) sharing of concepts, vi) development of local leadership, vii) organization of infrastructure, viii) final evaluation and wrap-up seminar, ix) ensuring sustainability, x) development of younger generation experts, and xi) sustainable and autonomous action.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool.

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) into Japanese and confirm the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of IBFAT. DESIGN: The methodological study examining the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the IBFAT. SETTING: A maternity hospital in Tokyo. PARTICIPANTS: Ten mother-newborn pairs were recruited for the reliability analysis. 101 mother-newborn pairs were recruited for the validity analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Reliability was verified by video recording and direct observation. The observers are one researcher, and 11 evaluators consisting of midwives and nurses. Amongst the 11 evaluators, six evaluators directly observed breastfeeding behaviours and five evaluators observed breastfeeding behaviours through video viewing. Regarding the inter-rater agreement, the intraclass correlation (ICC) between the researcher and six direct evaluators was 0.985 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.941-0.996) and that amongst five video viewing evaluators was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.647-0.945). In the intra-rater agreement, the lowest ICC amongst all those investigating IBFAT scores was 0.810 (95% CI: 0.433-0.948). In concurrent validity, the correlation coefficients between the IBFAT and Breastfeeding behaviour Assessment (BBA) scores on the first day after birth and the fourth or fifth day after birth (at discharge) were 0.66 (p < 0.001) and 0.40 (p < 0.001), respectively. In predictive validity, the medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) of IBFAT scores at discharge were 11.0 (IQR: 11.0-12.0) and 11.0 (IQR: 11.0-12.0) for the breast and mixed milk groups at one-month check-up, respectively. While both median values were the same, the Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference. KEY CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the IBFAT is valid and reliable for measuring feeding behaviour amongst newborns in the first week of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The Japanese version of the IBFAT can be available both in a clinical setting and in research to help support breastfeeding.

Relationship between facial skin problems with a focus on inflammatory cytokines and the presence of Malassezia in 1-month-old infants.

Infantile skin problems not only cause temporary pain and discomfort, but also have a long-term impact on health. Hence, the purpose of this cross-sectional study was to clarify the relationship between inflammatory cytokines and Malassezia fungal facial skin problems in infants. Ninety-six 1-month-old infants were examined. Facial skin problems and the presence of inflammatory cytokines in the forehead skin were assessed using the infant facial skin visual assessment tool (IFSAT) and the skin blotting method, respectively. Malassezia, a fungal commensal, was detected using forehead skin swabs, and its percentage in the total fungal population was analyzed. Infants with positive interleukin-8 signals were more likely to have severe facial skin problems (p = 0.006) and forehead papules (p = 0.043). No significant association between IFSAT scores and Malassezia was found, but infants with forehead dryness had a lower percentage of M. arunalokei in the total fungal population (p = 0.006). No significant association was observed between inflammatory cytokines and Malassezia in the study participants. Longitudinal studies on the development of facial skin problems in infants are warranted to investigate the involvement of interleukin-8 and devise preventive strategies in the future.

Development and validation of an infant facial skin assessment tool: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Severe infant eczema on the face should be treated early because it may lead to allergic diseases in the future. However, caregivers find it difficult to assess. A visual tool for caregivers is needed to easily determine infants' facial skin condition severity based on the tool's scores. We developed an infant facial skin assessment tool (IFSAT) and evaluated its reliability and validity. METHODS: The IFSAT draft was developed based on results of a previous literature review and qualitative sketch. Panels including medical professionals and a caregiver checked the draft's content and face validity, and the IFSAT was finalized. To test the IFSAT's reliability and validity, caregivers and one-month-old infants were recruited. Two scoring methods were additionally created based on the relation between the items and cure period. The relationships between scores and cure period, and the ability to predict whether the infant needed medical treatment were examined by each scoring method. For the predictive validity, scores for infants requiring medical treatment and those for infants who did not were also compared. For the intra-examiner reliability analysis, two pediatricians rated the scores separately twice using photographs. Inter-rater reliabilities were analyzed among pediatricians, nurses, and caregivers. RESULTS: Altogether, 113 infant-caregiver pairs participated in the testing phase. Of the two scoring methods created (versions 1 and 2), pediatricians' and caregivers' scores using versions 1 and 2 were related to the cure period. These scores predict whether the infant needed medical treatment. We then selected version 2 based on the medical professionals' opinions. The scores of caregivers of infants requiring medical treatment were higher than those of caregivers of infants not requiring treatment (p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of intra-examiner reliability was 0.87. The ICC of inter-rater reliabilities between pediatricians' and caregivers' scores and between nurses' and caregivers' scores were 0.66, and 0.66, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed IFSAT may be used to assess whether infants need medical treatment and whether to extend the cure period. The tool's reliability and validity were confirmed.